Subject	Whack - it says 100x67 for me here, on a PC at work. (n/m)
Posted by	TT XTZ on August 19, 2008 at 4:22 PM
	This message has been viewed 52 times.
In Reply To	My FF is 2.0.0.16 on a Mac, but pic properties say 825x550px (n/m) posted by TriniTT on August 19, 2008 at 04:19 PM
Message
Follow Ups	Bored at work...first time posting pics. - Obeeone 16:00:53 08/19/08 hmm - Insomniac (VA) 16:02:35 08/19/08 Excellent example of how outdated a car can look with pop-up - TriniTT 16:04:30 08/19/08 Well, there's good news and there's bad news... - BigTDogg (MA) 16:04:53 08/19/08 Really? They show up perfectly for me in FF. (n/m) - TriniTT 16:06:07 08/19/08 Weird - they look tiny for me in FF, except - TT XTZ 16:08:29 08/19/08 I just checked Safari and IE and they're tiny. - TriniTT 16:09:42 08/19/08 The top one's back to being tiny again for me. - TT XTZ 16:15:20 08/19/08 My FF is 2.0.0.16 on a Mac, but pic properties say 825x550px (n/m) - TriniTT 16:19:23 08/19/08 Whack - it says 100x67 for me here, on a PC at work. (n/m) - TT XTZ 16:22:04 08/19/08 Oh PCs... ;) (n/m) - TriniTT 16:26:12 08/19/08 Yeah yeah, I know - gotta have a PC to build stuff for - TT XTZ 16:30:43 08/19/08 Sounds a little oxymoronic to me... (n/m) - TriniTT 17:03:36 08/19/08 what's oxymoronic about the more versatille platform? - ZLover4Life 18:16:08 08/19/08 Not to get into this debate AGAIN, - TriniTT 19:18:55 08/19/08 We had an apple IIC in 5th grade, it ruled! (n/m) - LJZTT 21:01:26 08/19/08 I had a MacBook G4 that I used daily for a year and a half - ZLover4Life 21:48:56 08/19/08 Re: lol... - Obeeone 16:23:36 08/19/08 I'm using FF 3.0.1, same thing. (n/m) - BigTDogg (MA) 16:10:17 08/19/08 Re: Well, there's good news and there's bad news... - Obeeone 16:17:45 08/19/08 Photobucket is ok, I really like Flickr but I use both. (n/m) - TriniTT 16:21:40 08/19/08 Photodump.org, not .com, is the best site. (n/m) - BigTDogg (MA) 16:21:56 08/19/08 2nd. (n/m) - Z_Cherub 18:11:35 08/19/08 Re: Re: will try those and see if it fixes the problem. (n/m) - Obeeone 16:24:55 08/19/08 LOL! (n/m) - Piranha(AZ) 17:53:34 08/19/08 right click >> open image in new window. :) - Waggz 20:58:59 08/19/08 Orrrrrr just post properly :-) (n/m) - BigTDogg (MA) 06:54:40 08/20/08 Eh, sure. (n/m) - Waggz 20:01:23 08/20/08 Beautiful postage stamps! - TT XTZ 16:05:28 08/19/08 Re: Yeah really tiny..was working fine now miniature.. - Obeeone 16:20:50 08/19/08 Re: Re: see if these work viewing fine for me...photobucket - Obeeone 16:34:56 08/19/08 Much better! - TT XTZ 16:40:36 08/19/08 There we go....looks good buddy. Time for a detail day. (n/m) - MAD_96TT(MO) 16:44:17 08/19/08 Re: Yeah work in progress. (n/m) - Obeeone 16:58:14 08/19/08 Looks-wise, Z32 >> FD. How many agree? Outside of Z - Inzane 16:47:00 08/19/08 Having both (Z and FD), I find it hard to like one better - TheTwinZ (Peru) 17:34:10 08/19/08 Call me strange, but I've never LOVED the FD's lines. - TT XTZ 17:42:41 08/19/08 Stock for stock I personally like the FD looks better but - SeedyROM 17:59:37 08/19/08 FD's look like a Miata on steriods IMO (n/m) - outkaZTT 18:10:47 08/19/08 If I already don't have a target on my back :) - SactoTodd 18:30:55 08/19/08 oooh, I don't know, I couldn't pick either over the other (n/m) - LJZTT 21:25:08 08/19/08 IMO, Z32 > FD > MKIV > VR-4 (n/m) - BigTDogg (MA) 10:41:22 08/20/08 That's probably how I'd rank it too. (n/m) - Inzane 11:10:16 08/20/08 3000GarbageTruck shouldn't even be in that list. (n/m) - BradZ (FL) 15:42:33 08/20/08 No 19's, no care. (n/m) - ENVYMYZ 15:51:33 08/20/08 I can see now! Obeeone Kenobe has cured my blindness!! (n/m) - Got Z? 17:31:08 08/19/08 sweet man i live in the wasatch front - Luthandrian 18:07:13 08/19/08
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.